In this episode of The Energy Blueprint, I’m excited to share a recording of Dr. David Jockers interviewing me!
We cover a lot of fascinating topics, from how the mitochondria control our health and energy levels, the Cell Danger Response, how “stress” is often misunderstood, myths about antioxidants and plants (and the way things really work), and more.
Table of Contents
In this podcast, Dr. Jockers and I discuss:
- What, exactly, is the cell danger response developed by Dr. Robert Naviaux? And why does it matter if you’re experiencing symptoms that just won’t budge?
- 2 major roles of mitochondria and how they act as “canaries in the coal mine” when it comes to your health
- The 3 stages of the cell danger response and why the first stage is crucial to understand if you have chronic disease, especially chronic fatigue
- How the body evolved to effectively deal with certain stressors but not others…and how any chronic stress might mean getting stuck in “wartime metabolism”
- A new way to understand stress’s effect on your health—certain forms of stress aren’t as problematic as you think and will even improve your health in incredible ways!
- The surprising ways you can increase your resilience—including the size, number, and function of your mitochondria!—and reduce your chances of getting stuck in the cell danger response
- The real story of why plant foods are so good for you…they don’t act as antioxidants as most people think
- One of the most crucial pieces of information available for disease prevention and lifelong health…Ari reveals the secret he’s been researching for over a year!
Listen or download on iTunes
Listen outside iTunes
Transcript
The Cell Danger Response
Dr. Jockers: Ari Whitten, always great to connect with you, and always enjoy our conversations. One of the main topics I love talking with you about is the cell danger response because, really, not many functional practitioners or really, conventional doctors, this isn’t even on their radar, and most functional practitioners aren’t even really aware of it or at least not able to communicate it effectively. It’s really the way that we need to start looking at complex chronic illness, chronic inflammation and it’s essential to really understanding physiological processes in our body. Let’s break this down, cell danger response and its relationship with chronic inflammation.
Ari Whitten: That’s a big question. Let’s see. Where to begin? The cell danger response is, it’s a model, a hypothesis, and a way of conceptualizing what’s going on physiologically in health and disease states. It comes from a researcher, an MD–PhD, who runs a lab for mitochondrial medicine at the University of California, San Diego, named Dr. Robert Naviaux.
I think about 10 years ago he published the seminal paper that was called The Cell Danger Response. This was the first outline of this model, this way of understanding disease and health processes. He puts this really at the center of the vast majority of disease processes. He’s since published a number of papers since then developing this model, adding new layers of insights to it, also testing lots of things related to it in his lab at UCSD.
I think the most recent paper came out in 2023 which was titled, let me see if I can find it, Mitochondrial and Metabolic Features of Salugenesis and The Healing Cycle. I particularly like this because salugenesis or salutogenesis, which is the genesis, the creation of health as distinct from pathogenesis, the creation of disease processes, which is the focus of, really, the entirety of modern medicine, is a big focus of mine at this moment.
The basic idea of the cell danger response has a lot to do with mitochondria. Mitochondria are, in Dr. Naviaux’s words, the central hub of the wheel of metabolism. The metabolism is a word that most of us associate with weight loss and how many calories we burn, but the actual meaning of that word, that’s resting metabolic rate. That word has morphed into metabolism, but the true meaning of the word metabolism is actually all of the biochemical reactions that occur in your body. Basically, everything that’s going on in your body, everywhere in your body is metabolism.
What Dr. Naviaux is saying is that mitochondria are the central hub of all of this, of everything that’s going on in your body. This, in itself, is a really important thing to understand because the way we all learned, like you and me and all of our friends and colleagues, we all learned about mitochondria starting in grade school and in high school and in college and in graduate school and physiology and in medical school. All of these things, it was taught to us as really just the powerhouse of the cell. That’s the thing we got to remember on our exams.
We learn the electron transport chain. We learn how mitochondria turn fuel, carbohydrates and fats, ketones, into energy in the form of ATP, but really they’re framed as these mindless cellular energy generators that really all they do is they take in fuel from our food and they pump out ATP. That’s kind of, you learn the different process of NADH and FADH and this whole electron transport chain stuff and CoQ10 and blah, blah, blah, and ATP Synthes, and it pumps out ATP, but really the whole thing at the end of the day is really they take in fuel, they pump out energy. They’re mindless cellular energy generators.
And what Dr. Naviaux’s work did with the cell danger response was synthesize a huge body of evidence that has been accumulating over the last two or three decades from researchers all over the world on the other roles of mitochondria, like all these other things that we’ve been discovering that mitochondria do. It turns out they do a lot of different things in our body and they’re really important to almost everything that you could imagine. You can learn this really quickly by Googling any medical concept you can think up or any disease you can think up and mitochondria, and you’ll probably find a whole bunch of papers on that now.
The simplified idea of the cell danger response is really that, and I’m removing a lot of the complexity here intentionally for the sake of understanding, but the basic idea is that mitochondria actually have two major roles. One is the story that we were all told in our education, which is energy generators. They are these things that they do take in fuel, they pump out energy. That’s one major role that mitochondria have.
The other major role that they have is in cellular defense. It turns out that they are basically functioning as the canaries in the coal mine of our body. They are these exquisitely sensitive environmental sensors that are constantly taking samples of what’s going on inside the cell in the environment to perceive the environment and they’re asking the question, is it safe for us to produce energy? They’re trying to get a picture of whether the body is under threat or under attack in some way. If it isn’t, then they’re going to operate in what Dr. Naviaux calls peacetime metabolism and they’re going to produce energy in abundance and everything’s great.
However, to the extent that they pick up on danger signals, on threat signals that the body is under attack in some way, and we can talk in detail of what that means and how it’s sensed, to the extent that they pick up on those signals and to the extent that those signals are perceived to be an overwhelming threat that surpasses their capacity to deal with that threat, then they shift from energy mode, from peacetime metabolism into wartime metabolism, into the cell danger response.
What that cell danger response is all about is fighting off and combating the threat and protecting the body as much as possible from that threat. What happens in this state, the first phase of the cell danger response, which is really the most important phase, this is the crux of what the cell danger response is, is it really revolves around, we’re battening down the hatches.
We are trying to decrease the amount of signaling and communication going on. We’re shutting down cellular energy production. We’re throwing off lots of oxidative stress. We’re creating lots of inflammation to signal for our immune system cells to come into this area, which might be the whole body, or might be systemic in the blood, or might be localized to a particular area. We’re signaling for the immune system via oxidative stress, via inflammation to attack, to defend the body, and combat this threat.
As an analogy, imagine that you’re in your house and you’re preparing dinner, you’re chopping vegetables and you’re making dinner for your kids and then a criminal breaks in, puts a gun to your head, says, “Give me all your money. Give me all your valuable stuff,” you’re not just going to keep chopping vegetables and preparing dinner as normal. You have to stop doing that. You’ve got to deal with the threat.
To the extent that the body is under attack and under threat, it’s turning down the dial on all of the normal healthy metabolic processes and energy production in particular and switching to a mode of defense wartime metabolism and combating that threat. It’s important to understand these two modes, energy production mode and defense mode. The cell danger response are mutually exclusive to the extent you’re doing one, you’re not doing the other.
Dr. Jockers: It’s a great explanation. I think about the mitochondria as the nervous system of the cell. Basically, the brain and nervous system. We used to think they just had a motor function, kind of like your nervous system tells your bicep to flex. We know the nervous system was constantly taking in input and adapting to the environment around it. That’s basically what the mitochondria are doing. They have an afferent and efferent or a sensory and motor function, and they’re adapting to basically give us the greatest possible survival advantage.
In some cases, that means turning up oxidative stress. In fact, happens often. Turning up oxidative stress, which is a precursor to inflammation, and turning up inflammation, but that should be for a short period of time until we complete the healing cycle and return back to a peacetime physiology, but there are many factors that can keep us in this wartime physiology, and when we’re stuck in that, when we have an incomplete healing cycle, and we’re stuck in this wartime physiology, that’s when we end up with, over time, chronic inflammatory conditions. What are the things, what are some of the main factors that keep us stuck?
Ari Whitten: That was a great follow-up to everything I explained. That was the next layer of what I was going to explain. We’re like tag teaming this.
Dr. Jockers: That’s it. Well, I’ve been studying this for a while now, too. Credit to you as well. You’re one of the people that turned me on to the cell danger response. As you know, once you go down this rabbit hole, it’s really fascinating, and it changes the way you view how the body adapts. It’s something I’ve been studying and really doing my best to try to be able to be able to communicate as well.
Ari Whitten: Awesome. You’re doing a great job.
Things that keep you stuck in the Cell Danger Response
Dr. Jockers: Great. Let’s go into things that can keep us stuck in that cell danger response and incomplete basically. We need to complete the healing cycle. If we don’t, obviously that’s going to lead to chronic inflammation. What keeps us stuck in the cell danger response?
Ari Whitten: There’s a simple and short answer to this, and there’s a longer, more complex answer, and there’s a whole lot of nuance and potential complexities that could be involved as well. The very simple and short version is, if the stressors that are inducing the state of the cell danger response in the first place are continually present without letting up, then you can expect the cell danger response to be more persistent or chronic, or the body to get stuck in that place.
As an example, we can think of the cell danger response, the normal inflammatory process, in the context of, let’s say, an acute injury like you’re playing soccer, you sprain your ankle, you’ve got inflammation and swelling, and redness, and you’ve got an inflammatory response in that area. Immune cells are activated to take care of that and repair the damage.
Or the same is true, like in the context of the common cold or flu or COVID or in the context of an infection, you got this transient activation for several days, maybe a couple weeks, to deal with the threat, and then you have resolution. This is the cell danger response phase 2 and phase 3, and then ultimately getting back to health and normal function. This is a cyclical process. Health, okay, now we’ve got to deal with a threat, cell danger response 1, cell danger response phase 2, 3, and back to health. That’s how this system is designed to function and functions very well in the context of acute stressors, injuries, infections, most things that we’re designed ancestrally to deal with.
In the modern world, this picture changes, and we sometimes have different stressors that we can be exposed to that are relatively chronic or persistent. For example, if we’ve got heavy metals exposure that stays stuck in our body for a long period of time, if we are chronically getting exposed to mycotoxins from the place we live, or if we’re getting exposed to other toxins from our food, from our water supply, from the air we’re breathing constantly, and we are not escaping that.
If it’s just a chronic never-ending unrelenting onslaught of stress that the body is trying to deal with, we can’t expect it to return to health and normal function because it’s still trying to deal with those threats. It hasn’t had the time and the space to be removed from the sources of stress to be able to recover. That’s the very simple version of it is, as long as you have these stressors that have triggered you into the cell danger response in the first place still present in your life, you can expect to stay in the cell danger response.
The more complex answer to this is, we have to– I’ll explain two models of ways of understanding conceptualizing disease. One is called the allostatic load model of health and disease. This is the dominant model, the way that most people in functional medicine and natural health tend to understand health.
The basic idea is, the more we have total body stress load from toxins, from sleep deprivation and circadian rhythm disruption, from psychological stress from all sources, from relationships, from our job, from traffic jams, from whatever we’re dealing with, the more we have a poor diet, the more we drink alcohol, the more we smoke, the more we get all the fundamentals wrong in the way that we are living and the environment we’re in, the more we have these stressors that are impinging on our body’s ability to maintain homeostasis. This is basically called allostatic load or total body stress load.
At a certain point, at a certain threshold, when that allostatic load gets big enough, the body stops being able to maintain homeostasis, and then we have the beginnings of symptoms and disease and our physical decline. That’s a really good, useful, and highly accurate model and way to understand human health, but it doesn’t go quite far enough.
There’s a better model that is not very well known outside of GeroScience circles. GeroScience is the study of human aging, the study of aging in general. This is called the homeodynamic space model of human health. Basically, the homeodynamic space model incorporates everything from the allostatic load model, for the most part, but it adds one layer to the discussion, which is, what is the organism’s stress buffering capacity?
The role of resilience in health/ the Homeodynamic space model
Dr. Jockers: Resilience.
Ari Whitten: Yes, exactly. The allostatic load model generally says, okay, we’ve got these stressors. These stressors cause disease. What do we do to fix the situation? We do our best to remove these sources of stressors on the organism. Great, awesome. However, what’s missing from this picture is resilience, the resilience and the ability to resist these stressors without being damaged by them is also central in this picture.
The more that you understand what resilience actually is physiologically and how the modern world affects it, the more you realize that physiological resilience is actually just as big of a player in this discussion as all of these different stressors of the modern world. What we really have, and I’ll tie this back into the cell danger response, what we really have is, yes, we’ve got a modern world and environment that have a high allostatic load that strain the body’s ability to maintain a state of health and homeostasis.
We’ve also got a modern world and a modern lifestyle that drives loss of physiological resilience in numerous of the systems of our body that are critical in resisting the negative effects of these stressors, the allostatic load. What that does is it shifts the balance to make us much more easily overwhelmed by these stressors in our life and in our environment. If you remember what I said earlier when I was describing the cell danger response, it’s when the mitochondria perceived themselves to be under attack to a degree that they don’t have the capacity to deal with, and that was an allusion to physiological resilience.
That picture, more allostatic load, less resilience, leads to a situation where we are much more likely to be overwhelmed by the stressors in our environment and to be stuck in the cell danger response. There’s two things we have to fix. We have to minimize and reduce and eliminate the sources of allostatic load as much as possible from our life and we have to build resilience back into our physiology in order to shift ourselves out of this chronic state of inflammation, this chronic state of the cell danger response.
Dr. Jockers: That’s a great explanation. You said that that theory is the homeodynamic. What was it? The homeodynamic?
Ari Whitten: Homeodynamic space model.
Dr. Jockers: Space model. If we were to put that into a math equation, from what I’m understanding you saying, if it was like a division problem, the overall allostatic load, or the cumulative effect of toxins, infections, stressors on our body would be at the top. I can’t remember what the numerator or denominator is. So it’s at the top. Then it’s being divided by your overall stress resilience, which would be pretty much determined by the amount of healthy, high-functioning mitochondria within the cells of the body. I would imagine that would be a big factor when it comes to your overall stress resilience. That would be at the bottom. It would be being divided by that.
The higher overall number, so equal to the higher overall number would be more of, in a sense, the downward pressure causing you to stay stuck in the cell danger response developing chronic disease. Whereas the lower the number, because you have a higher number at the bottom, the division number, lower allostatic load at the top, the more overall resilient your body is and the lower the potential for developing chronic illness.
Ari Whitten: I believe so. I say that because I’ve never conceptualized this in terms of that.
Dr. Jockers: Well, that’s why we’re having conversations like this.
Ari Whitten: I’ll tell you, and I certainly understand what you’re getting at here. I’ll tell you how I think about it. I’ll give some examples.
Dr. Jockers: I think I’m going to put that into an infographic and send it over to you.
Ari Whitten: Yes. There are infographics on this if somebody wants to do a Google image search. What the infographics that I like generally show are, let’s imagine that we have a line here that is our threshold for where we– picture a bar graph. We have a line here through the middle of the graph that is our threshold where if we go below that line, in terms of our resilience, we now have basically– let’s see how I want to explain this. This is the critical threshold. If you go under this capacity, this threshold, you start to get the beginnings of disease processes.
This bar represents your stress buffering capacity. If it shrinks to the point where it goes below this bar, now you’ve got the beginnings of disease. Mitochondria play a central role in this, I’ll talk about that in a minute, but I’ll give another example because actually, this principle extends to almost every system of the body. This is actually the subject of the book I’ve been writing for the last year. You’d be shocked at how many different systems of the body this applies to. I’ll give one example here.
Cognitive reserve capacity
There’s something that is in the literature called cognitive reserve capacity. There’s another distinct concept in the literature called brain reserve capacity. These two things are actually much more overlapping than a lot of the literature indicates or tries to imply. Basically what this is, is the concept that I’m describing, it’s the homeodynamic space of the brain.
Now what builds this homeodynamic space of the brain, this cognitive reserve capacity? Turns out, learning things builds your cognitive reserve capacity. Learning things, learning new things, challenging things, challenges the neural circuitry of your brain, much like lifting heavy weights challenges your muscles to grow bigger and stronger. In response, they do grow bigger and stronger. The neuronal circuitry of your brain literally structurally grows stronger.
This is mediated by a whole number of things, different molecules, dendritic spines, better connections between neurons, specific neurons and networks of neurons, and the actual physical structural robustness of certain areas of the brain and that you can actually see if you do a brain scan. This cognitive reserve capacity came to be discovered basically because they found that people who had more education in their life, more formal education were strongly protected from neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and dementia.
Learning things, like going to school and learning things or learning a language, or learning a musical instrument, or even learning physical things like dancing or a sport, creates more cognitive reserve capacity in the brain, which actually translates into being able to resist a lot of the forces that would otherwise degenerate the brain and end up with giving you dementia or Alzheimer’s dementia.
If you picture that bar graph that I described before, and here’s the cutoff for where you start getting Alzheimer’s or dementia, and somebody with high cognitive reserve capacity who has spent a lot of their life engaged in active learning and education is way up here in terms of their stress buffering capacity. They can go many, many more years and endure a lot more stress on that system before they ever get down to that threshold where they’re going to start exhibiting dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Whereas somebody with much lower reserve capacity in their brain has a much smaller window of time and much smaller capacity to endure stress on that system before that system degenerates to the point where now you’re exhibiting Alzheimer’s disease and dementia.
This is a spectrum, and it is about your physiological resilience and capacity to endure stress on that system, whether it’s biochemical stress, whether it’s toxins, whether it’s sleep deprivation, any type of stress on that system, your capacity to resist it without being damaged and to resist it long enough that it ends up not being the thing that kills you.
Now that principle that I just described, again, I’m writing a book, basically one chapter of the book is on cognitive reserve capacity.
The role of mitochondria in health
The other chapters are on all the other physiological capacities in the different areas of our body and how they protect us against disease and bolster our health and longevity, but mitochondria, as you said, are also central to this story. This is our bioenergetic reserve capacity.
One of the things that we have to understand is basically any type of stressor you can imagine, any type of stress on that system is creating a bioenergetic stress on that system. Whether it’s toxins, whether it’s sleep deprivation, whether it’s even healthy things like exercise or learning things, like I just described in the brain, and all the sources of bad stress and allostatic load you can imagine, they are all creating an energetic stress on the cells of the body as well.
The capacity of your mitochondria to meet that and handle that energetic stress or not handle it is a huge determinant of whether you will end up with your mitochondria shifted into the cell danger response. Let me give you another data point to overlay on this. It’s been shown in a number of studies that the average 70-year-old has lost 75% of their mitochondrial capacity.
This is a combination of two things. The mitochondria themselves are shrinking, physically shrinking to about half the size, and the number of mitochondria that are present per cell are also being reduced to about half the size. The combination of those two things, if you do the math, since you’re a math guy apparently, better than me, the combination of those two things is a loss of 75% of your mitochondrial capacity.
Now, I hate percentages because it doesn’t really do this justice for people to really get this. What this means is that if you were at 100% capacity when you were 20 and you’re now at 25% of your capacity, this is like going from a Ferrari V8 engine in your cells when you were 20 to a Moped engine in your cells when you’re 25. Do you think that that affects your ability to handle or resist bioenergetic stresses, to resist the forces of stress on that system? Absolutely.
Dr. Jockers: Absolutely.
Ari Whitten: It affects it to a massive, massive degree. This is fundamentally why mitochondrial dysfunction, this buzzword in natural health now is linked with so many different disease processes.
Dr. Jockers: Yes, for sure. I always say the quality of your life is going to come down to the amount of mitochondria and the quality of the mitochondria. Because there’s a big difference between a senescent mitochondria, which all of us have to some degree, and a young, very stress-resilient mitochondria. There’s a night and day difference there. You may have a certain amount of mitochondria, but if a high percentage of those are senescent or age-dysfunctional mitochondria, in a sense, your overall functionality and your stress resilience can be a lot lower than somebody that has the same amount of mitochondria, but a higher percentage of stress-resilient, high-functioning mitochondria.
Ari Whitten: That’s right. I’m glad you brought that up because I left one key point out of the story that I just told, which is, as you just implied, the quality and quantity of the mitochondria in our cells is highly malleable. This picture I just painted of losing 75% of your mitochondrial capacity as you get older is actually just the average of what normally and typically happens to most people. What this isn’t is a claim that “aging does this to our mitochondria in a sort of biologically predetermined way.” Actually, it’s the opposite.
Here’s the good news. Because you’re probably feeling really like this is really bad news, learning that your mitochondria and mitochondrial capacity decline so much with aging. If that’s got you feeling down, here’s the good news. The good news is when we look at 70-year-olds who are lifelong exercisers, they have the same mitochondrial capacity as young people do, so this is not a function of aging per se. This is a function of our lifestyle.
What’s really going on here, in terms of mitochondrial size, mitochondrial quantity, and quality, is that this is fundamentally a product of the way we live and, specifically, the degree of demand we put on those systems. In the same way, I could tell you, and this is much easier for people to understand because it’s much more outwardly visible, as soon as things start going down to a smaller level, humans make the mistake of thinking, “Oh, this is driven by mysterious biochemicals, and I need to take a drug for this,” but when it’s big and outwardly visible, we have a much more time with the logic of understanding things in the proper way.
Muscles. With muscles, if we challenge our muscles by lifting heavy objects, what do they do? They interpret this as a stimulus to adapt to this challenge by growing bigger and stronger. It’s a survival stimulus. Basically, they’re going, in order to better handle the challenges of my environment, to better survive my environment, and to be less damaged by the stress of my environment, I need to adapt to these demands by growing bigger and stronger muscles.
The opposite is also true. Before I get there, this is actually an amazing thing. If you look at a chair or a bicycle or a car or any sort of other object in our environment, any inanimate object, they don’t do this. They don’t have the capacity to sense and adapt to the demands on them. The more demands you place on those systems, the faster they break down and wear out and degenerate.
Humans and living organisms, more broadly, but humans are especially good at this, have an incredible, almost magical ability to sense demands on the different systems of our body and adapt to them not by degenerating but by actually growing stronger. As magical and amazing as that is, there is a downside to it, which is the opposite also is true. What happens if you immobilize muscles in a cast, like if you’ve ever broken a bone?
Dr. Jockers: They atrophy.
Ari Whitten: Exactly. Eight weeks later, you go to the doctor, they saw off your cast, you look down at your arm or leg, and it’s half the size of the other one. Because the body similarly sensed, well, we only care about survival. I guess we don’t need these muscles to survive our environment. They’re not being used, so they’re just an energetic liability. They’re just consuming resources, protein, and energy without serving any purpose that facilitates our survival, so let’s get rid of them.
The same exact principles of growth and atrophy also apply at the microscopic level with our mitochondria. When they are challenged regularly, they grow bigger and stronger, they engage in quality control processes, which is what you were alluding to earlier, mitophagy and preventing senescence, improving the actual health and function of those systems, growing larger and growing more of them from scratch from a process called mitochondrial biogenesis. So you can actually reverse that trend that I was talking about before. You can actually increase the number of mitochondria as well.
If you don’t challenge your mitochondria regularly, and there are physical challenges that challenge the mitochondria in different systems of the body, also, think of it this way, cognitive challenges also challenge the mitochondria of the brain, of the neural circuitry of the brain in unique ways, and there can even be broken down further from there of specific types of cognitive challenge, challenge the mitochondria in different systems of the brain in unique ways.
In response to those challenges, those mitochondria adapt by growing bigger and stronger and becoming more numerous. The converse is also true. If you live a life lacking in those stimuli, in those challenges to those systems, the mitochondria shrink and atrophy and literally die off, so you have fewer of them. As a result of that, you massively decrease your physiological resilience.
Dr. Jockers: You’re talking about this concept of hormetic stressors, like exercise, for example. If you do an intense workout like I did today, like you probably did today, if I took my blood work right while I was doing that, or right afterwards, it would look like I had a heart attack, massive inflammatory numbers, but 24 hours later, my inflammatory numbers are really low, I show all signs of great metabolic health, and my system has adapted to create more endogenous antioxidant production, better oxidative stress buffering, and just better cell-to-cell communication, all the things that we want for stress resilience, but I got the right dose.
That’s the other thing with the hormetic stressors because there’s certainly a limit where you or I could easily overtrain, I’ve been there before, where we’re doing too much physical activity, not resting enough, not getting enough of the stimuli, like melatonin and human growth hormone production from good quality sleep, to where we’re not able to adapt and recover effectively, and then we’re overstressing our system.
We’ve got to get the right dose of these stressors, like exercise, like learning, which anybody that’s a little bit older, you start trying to learn something new, you get pretty easily frustrated, so it is a stressor on the mind. We’ve got to get the right dose of these hormetic stressors to appropriately boost our resilience factor, and not too much but also not too little.
Ari Whitten: Yes, that’s right. There’s a number of principles to extend off of that, but one thing to understand is that basically too much– let me put it this way. We have an abnormal way of thinking about certain stressors. Exercise, which we all think of as something that promotes health, is, as you alluded to with your blood test results there, a stressor on the body. It is a physiological stressor that creates metabolic waste, that creates a big spike of oxidative stress and even inflammation in the system.
It is, genuinely, a stress on the system. If you overdo it, as you’ve said, if you overwhelm the system with that stress, it will create harm. The beautiful thing though is that when we engage in types of stress that are biologically appropriate for us because they were historically present in our ancestors over countless millennia, what happens is we are uniquely well adapted to creating adaptations to that stressor that actually make us stronger.
This is a distinction between certain types of stressors that are biologically appropriate and were present for the human species for a very long time, that we are accustomed to versus certain types of stressors like, let’s say, lots of the modern toxins in our environment that we are not well suited to adapt to that we have enormous difficulty transforming from something bad into something good.
Exercise is a stress that we can transform from something that is, in the immediate terms, something bad or potentially bad, into something over time when we engage in it consistently and when we engage in it at a dose, as you said, that is appropriate for our individual capacity, which differs widely between individuals. When we get that dose right, and we go just a bit outside of our comfort zone, just slightly above our current capacity, we stimulate transient harm, basically, but that transient harm is transformed into signals that make adaptations that in the long term make us stronger, healthier, and more resilient to future exposures to stress.
Dr. Jockers: Yes, absolutely. That’s this idea of hormetic stressors. There’s a whole number of different hormetic stressors, exercise being probably the number one example that people understand, but learning, like you mentioned, that’s a hormetic stressor. In our society today, a lot of people are doing things like cold plunges, getting cold exposure. There could be certain types of breathing like breath holds or just box breathing and things like that that are somewhat of a hormetic stressor as well because we’re being exposed to more carbon dioxide. So many people are short shallow breathers, and I know you have a whole training on that.
Fasting is definitely a hormetic stressor. Our ancestors would go, because they didn’t have pantries, so they would go, at times, long periods of time without consuming food, and their body was able to adapt to it. Time-restricted feeding or a fasting strategy, that can be a hormetic stressor that, if done in the right dose, can make us more metabolically fit and stronger. Might obviously help increase the quality and quantity of mitochondria. We have all these types of hormetic stressors that can help prime us for resilience. Where do you recommend people start with some of these different areas that they can focus on?
Ari Whitten: Yes, there’s so many. You mentioned a good list there. I would add sauna exposure to that list.
Dr. Jockers: Heat, yes.
Ari Whitten: Another aspect is actually phytochemicals, very common. An extremely widespread misunderstanding is that most of the beneficial phytochemicals are actually not antioxidants, as most people think they are. They’re actually xeno hormetic stressors or xeno [unintelligible 00:41:51] and they stimulate a low-level oxidative stress that is transformed, much like exercise and many of the other stressors, transformed into beneficial adaptations.
The spike in oxidative stress is actually transformed into an adaptation of bolstering and building up what’s called the ARE, the antioxidant response element, which is our internal cellular antioxidant system. The more you engage in these types of stressors and really exercise, breath holding, sauna exposure, cold exposure, all of these actually create oxidative stress, which is something that we all have been taught in most circles to think of as a bad thing, but actually, interestingly enough– well, I’ll tell an interesting background story related to that.
About 15 or 20 years ago or so, researchers actually decided to study this. What they did was they recognized that exercise had a whole bunch of health benefits associated with it. At that time, of course, it was already known that exercise was very good for us, that it helped to prevent disease and so on, but it was thought at that time that it’s really unfortunate that exercise also creates this big spike of oxidative stress of free radicals, and that these free radicals are damaging us. So what if we take antioxidant supplements in tandem with exercise, so we get all the good stuff from exercise, all these benefits, reduce risk of so many different diseases, but we eliminate the downside of exercise, which is these free radicals, this oxidative stress?
These researchers found something unexpected in these studies. The more that they supplemented with antioxidants, vitamin A, C, E, things like that, before, during, or after exercise, the more that they actually reduced and canceled out and inhibited the metabolic benefits of exercise. Because it turns out that part of the adaptations to exercise, a big part, are actually adaptations to the oxidative stress induced by exercise.
That oxidative stress is actually a signal to grow that internal antioxidation system, redox system, bigger and stronger. If you take exogenous antioxidants that reduce the oxidative stress, you reduce the signal on your internal antioxidant system to grow stronger, and it turns out the oxidants are actually a vital signaling molecule for mitochondria themselves to detect that there is a need for increased bioenergetic capacity.
All that stuff I was talking about before, about mitochondrial growth and biogenesis, actually depends on oxidative stress signaling. Mitochondria have to detect the presence of oxidative stress, which is essentially a signal that is translated by them as, oh, we’re being overwhelmed. This stressor is exceeding our bioenergetic production capacity, so let’s adapt to it to prevent oxidative damage from future exposures to the stress by growing bigger and stronger so we can produce more energy so we can handle this bioenergetic demand on the system in the future.
Those are all wonderful elements. There’s a number of psychological aspects to this story as well. We create psychological adaptations to mentally difficult things in the same way that we create, in the psychological as well as neurological, actually at the level of the brain in very much the same way that we create physical adaptations and cellular and biochemical adaptations to more physical stressors. Cognitive reserve capacity being one of them, but there’s actually many other dimensions of that as well.
The actual resilience to stress is a neurally mediated, in large part, capacity like, what is your psycho-emotional reserve capacity? What is your level of resilience to handle psychological and emotional stress? Courage, willpower, these are also neurally mediated capacities that are trainable in much the same way that muscular strength is trainable via lifting weights.
Dr. Jockers: This is really good stuff. We can go for another hour on this, but what I will say is that I know the listeners got a ton of value out of this interview here. Guys, you can check out Ari and all his podcasts, his programs, his supplement formulas at the the energyblueprint.com. I know he’s got a great program on breathing, also one on gut health. He’s got a great book as well, a couple of great books. Eat for Energy: How to Beat Fatigue, Supercharge Your Mitochondria, and Unlock All-Day Energy talks about the phytochemicals, talks about time-restricted feeding, a lot of the things that we discussed here just recently.
He also has the ultimate guide to red light therapy as well. Some great books. Ari’s one of my favorite people in the natural health space to talk to about these ideas. I hope you guys got a lot of value out of this. Ari, any last words or inspiration here for our audience?
Ari Whitten: I would say the big principle that I want people to realize that really is an extension of everything that I’ve talked about here is to realize how much of your physiology is malleable and plastic and is a function of your behaviors, and you are not, as so much of the medical narrative wants to push on you, just a victim of biochemicals floating around in your body. The biochemistry that you assess on blood tests is hugely a function of the structure and function that you have built, that you have built in different systems of your body. The biggest key to health and disease prevention and energy and longevity is building those capacities.
Dr. Jockers: Love that. Ari, always a pleasure, my friend. Be blessed.
Show Notes
00:00 – Intro
02:36 – The Cell Danger Response
13:43 – Things that keep you stuck in the Cell Danger Response
19:25 – The role of resilience in health/ the Homeodynamic space model
25:23 – Cognitive reserve capacity
29:06 – The role of mitochondria in health
Links
Check out the study Metabolic features of the cell danger response